In a recent B.C. Supreme Court case, a woman alleged that she suffered from a driving phobia as a result of a 2007 rear-end collision.
Her social media posts suggested otherwise.
In coming to his decision, Mr. Justice Walker relied in part on the woman’s Facebook updates to reach the conclusion that she was not a credible witness.
Among other things, the woman posted a comment about driving her mother’s manual transmission BMW late at night and at high speed.
Here’s what the post said:
[*The Plaintiff] is finally remembering how awesome it is to drive 120 clicks on a clear road in her car (A ♥’s Speedy G).
In his ruling, the judge said the woman has “a mindset that continues to be heavily focused on the accident as the cause of every problem or difficulty she has faced since.
I also found [The Plaintiff’s] attitude towards defence counsel during the exchange to have been inappropriately condescending.”
The judge went on to reject the woman’s submission that her Facebook posts should be characterized as “youthful boasting” and found that the postings accurately reflected her mindset when they were made.
There’s a lesson here. Comments made on social media sites are often easily found with a simple online search engine. Always be aware of the public nature of social media and the fact that, once something has been posted, it never truly gets erased and is open to scrutiny by the courts.
Hammerco Lawyers is working within the civil legal system to hold the Fab Skin Clinic and its employees accountable for the trauma and harm they have caused the patients who underwent treatment at the clinic.
WestJet is alleged to have published two prices for checked bags, one that was free and another that was higher, and then charged passengers for the higher fee between September 2014 and March 2019.
A new claims process has been launched to compensate individuals who attended Residential Schools as day scholars.