On May 6, 2020, reasons for judgment were released in Swereda (Re), a decision by Madam Justice Shergill.
The petition was originally brought seeking appointment of a committee for the person and estate of Ms. Swereda. It was opposed by the Public Guardian and Trustee (PGT).
Tragically, Ms. Swereda passed away before the petition could be heard by the court.
The issue before Madam Justice Shergill was whether the petitioner was entitled to her costs on the basis that she brought the petition for the benefit, and in the best interests, of Ms. Swereda.
The PGT was opposing the application, and seeking its own costs. It alleged that the petition was not brought in the best interests of Ms. Swereda, but rather out of a desire for control.
Ultimately, the application for costs was successful. The court accepted the petitioner’s arguments that the petition was brought in the best interests of Ms. Swereda, and concluded that the petitioner was “a vocal and forceful advocate who at all times was trying to act in the Patient’s best interests”.
Further, that although the petitioner might have “ruffled a few feathers” with care workers, she “expended her own resources and a considerable amount of time taking care of Ms. Swereda’s interests, all without any obvious personal benefit.”
Hammerco Lawyers is partnering with Toronto law firm KND Complex Litigation on a potential class action lawsuit against GoTo Technologies USA, Inc. and related companies.
We’ve redesigned our navigation and site menu with you in mind. Now, it’s easier to find information about the services we offer and how we can support you to achieve positive legal outcomes.
Stressed about the idea of going to court? There may be another way.
Join us in congratulating Alexia Majidi on becoming Hammerco Lawyers’ newest partner.